(no subject)
Apr. 19th, 2004 08:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't know why I feel the way I do about this, and I'm probably oversimplifying things or something, but personally I think the public lynching of christalgamgee has lasted long enough now.
Those who found her out were perfectly right in bringing it out in the open and showing evidence too. She's a fraud and people should know about that, so they won't pay her money for something that isn't what she claims it to be. So she won't be able to use other people's work and show it of as if it's her own.
The wank has spread far and wide, so I think she won't have much chance anymore of cheating people, and the people she can cheat now can't be convinced no matter how much people come up with proof: some people will just never get it. Nothing that can be done about that.
But there's a difference between doing what's right by exposing a cheater for what she really is, and using self-righteousness to justify ripping a person apart.
Maybe she doesn't behave like she's broken yet. Do we have to go on until she is? She brought it on herself, but in our society people have the right to be trailed according to certain rules. Those rules don't seem to apply on the inter net.
Personally I got the message: She was wrong, she's been found out, I don't think many people will fall for her tricks anymore and those who do can't be helped, maybe keep an eye on her in case she tries something again (I'm sure there are enough people out there who will be more than happy to do that) and can't we just leave it at that?
It's so easy to be decent to those we like. Let's try and be decent to those we don't like, that's what makes us human. I strongly believe in that.
Those who found her out were perfectly right in bringing it out in the open and showing evidence too. She's a fraud and people should know about that, so they won't pay her money for something that isn't what she claims it to be. So she won't be able to use other people's work and show it of as if it's her own.
The wank has spread far and wide, so I think she won't have much chance anymore of cheating people, and the people she can cheat now can't be convinced no matter how much people come up with proof: some people will just never get it. Nothing that can be done about that.
But there's a difference between doing what's right by exposing a cheater for what she really is, and using self-righteousness to justify ripping a person apart.
Maybe she doesn't behave like she's broken yet. Do we have to go on until she is? She brought it on herself, but in our society people have the right to be trailed according to certain rules. Those rules don't seem to apply on the inter net.
Personally I got the message: She was wrong, she's been found out, I don't think many people will fall for her tricks anymore and those who do can't be helped, maybe keep an eye on her in case she tries something again (I'm sure there are enough people out there who will be more than happy to do that) and can't we just leave it at that?
It's so easy to be decent to those we like. Let's try and be decent to those we don't like, that's what makes us human. I strongly believe in that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:43 pm (UTC)Word.
Date: 2004-04-19 12:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:50 pm (UTC)Right. You know, I was seriously considering posting an entry which said: 'am I the only one who actually feels sorry for chrystalgamgee??' Because the first thing I thought when I read about her fraud, and saw the pictures she made, was: this is a girl with some really big issues. Obviously she feels the need to get attention by lying and cheating, and that's very, very sad. Sure, what she did wasn't very nice, but isn't there anyone who sees she's actually crying out for attention?? Even if she really thinks she's a wonderful person, and she deserves credit for what she's done, deep down she's still a sad girl crying out to be noticed. At least, that's my impression...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:00 pm (UTC)I just heard a thing on the radio about the Mormons doing a competition to see who could come up with the best candidate for an 11th commandment. I didn't think much of it at the time. (We Jews have 613, after all!) But I have a new one:
THOU SHALT NOT WANK!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:22 pm (UTC)Well expressed. It should be what makes us decent people and you are a good person for saying so.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 03:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 05:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 06:02 pm (UTC)And in the end, f_w makes no excuses for this fact: it exists to mock people. And yes, that can be cruel, or it can just be plain funny, but f_w makes no excuses and doesn't pretend to be anything other than what it is. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I'm not trying to excuse f_w or it's members for being mean, I just think you're misrepresenting it a bit by saying that people at f_w aren't letting the crystal thing go becuase at this point, no one's talking about her because the injokes are and have always been far funnier than the wankers.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 09:46 pm (UTC)It's like, all these internal feuds that we can't resolve, because no-one is right or wrong.
So when we DO find someone who is wrong, we beat it to death. It was the same way with the notorious VB/Mr. Frodo. Yeah, she's a wacko and was out to defraud people, but MONTHS of self-pity and self-congratulations and post mortems?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-20 10:49 am (UTC)Re: last paragraph
Date: 2004-04-20 12:51 pm (UTC)But once you've got one hand nailed up, how do you plan to drive in the OTHER nail?
Date: 2004-04-20 03:33 pm (UTC)Re: But once you've got one hand nailed up, how do you plan to drive in the OTHER nail?
From: