(no subject)
Apr. 19th, 2004 08:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't know why I feel the way I do about this, and I'm probably oversimplifying things or something, but personally I think the public lynching of christalgamgee has lasted long enough now.
Those who found her out were perfectly right in bringing it out in the open and showing evidence too. She's a fraud and people should know about that, so they won't pay her money for something that isn't what she claims it to be. So she won't be able to use other people's work and show it of as if it's her own.
The wank has spread far and wide, so I think she won't have much chance anymore of cheating people, and the people she can cheat now can't be convinced no matter how much people come up with proof: some people will just never get it. Nothing that can be done about that.
But there's a difference between doing what's right by exposing a cheater for what she really is, and using self-righteousness to justify ripping a person apart.
Maybe she doesn't behave like she's broken yet. Do we have to go on until she is? She brought it on herself, but in our society people have the right to be trailed according to certain rules. Those rules don't seem to apply on the inter net.
Personally I got the message: She was wrong, she's been found out, I don't think many people will fall for her tricks anymore and those who do can't be helped, maybe keep an eye on her in case she tries something again (I'm sure there are enough people out there who will be more than happy to do that) and can't we just leave it at that?
It's so easy to be decent to those we like. Let's try and be decent to those we don't like, that's what makes us human. I strongly believe in that.
Those who found her out were perfectly right in bringing it out in the open and showing evidence too. She's a fraud and people should know about that, so they won't pay her money for something that isn't what she claims it to be. So she won't be able to use other people's work and show it of as if it's her own.
The wank has spread far and wide, so I think she won't have much chance anymore of cheating people, and the people she can cheat now can't be convinced no matter how much people come up with proof: some people will just never get it. Nothing that can be done about that.
But there's a difference between doing what's right by exposing a cheater for what she really is, and using self-righteousness to justify ripping a person apart.
Maybe she doesn't behave like she's broken yet. Do we have to go on until she is? She brought it on herself, but in our society people have the right to be trailed according to certain rules. Those rules don't seem to apply on the inter net.
Personally I got the message: She was wrong, she's been found out, I don't think many people will fall for her tricks anymore and those who do can't be helped, maybe keep an eye on her in case she tries something again (I'm sure there are enough people out there who will be more than happy to do that) and can't we just leave it at that?
It's so easy to be decent to those we like. Let's try and be decent to those we don't like, that's what makes us human. I strongly believe in that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:43 pm (UTC)Word.
Date: 2004-04-19 12:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:50 pm (UTC)Right. You know, I was seriously considering posting an entry which said: 'am I the only one who actually feels sorry for chrystalgamgee??' Because the first thing I thought when I read about her fraud, and saw the pictures she made, was: this is a girl with some really big issues. Obviously she feels the need to get attention by lying and cheating, and that's very, very sad. Sure, what she did wasn't very nice, but isn't there anyone who sees she's actually crying out for attention?? Even if she really thinks she's a wonderful person, and she deserves credit for what she's done, deep down she's still a sad girl crying out to be noticed. At least, that's my impression...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 04:57 pm (UTC)I did feel a bit sorry for her after reading f_w, but I heard she was selling photos ? and that I think goes beyond just personal denial. But I am hearing all this stuff third, fourth, and fifth hand so...*shrug*
It started days ago and I agree it should be done with by now.
This thing is gonna end up like Janet Jackson at the superbowl! *howls*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:00 pm (UTC)I just heard a thing on the radio about the Mormons doing a competition to see who could come up with the best candidate for an 11th commandment. I didn't think much of it at the time. (We Jews have 613, after all!) But I have a new one:
THOU SHALT NOT WANK!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:20 pm (UTC)But you see, that's the thing: people like that feed on the attention. She doesn't care if it's positive or negative reinforcement. To her it's all reinforcement. That's why it becomes such an endless cycle of negativity: the wankers feed on the victim and the victim feeds on the wank.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:36 pm (UTC)Everyone in the wank community is now aware of Crystal's game. Everyone outside the wank community is as well. Therefore, the only purpose served by the wank is to feed her need for attention. She's manipulating the wankers to serve her own purposes. To my mind, she's the one who "wins," and the wankers are simply her stooges.
Anyway, I don't want turn the lovely
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-20 03:41 am (UTC)nope, it's cracking a hell of a lot of us a HELL OF A LOT. and that's the entire reason for FW's existence in the first place, so it doens't strike me as very surprising, or out of line of the usual. the only 'wow' here is coming from her amazing brand of stubborness and the amazing number of comments.
but as FW's userinfo stated clearly:
We reserve the right to wander off topic as much as we like. If you got wanked and there's 250 comments on your thread, then guess what! Most likely very few of them will mention you at all. The only way you'll know what we're talking about is to read all the comments. Yeah that sucks, so sorry.
there's a lot of off-topic, a lot of photoshop fun, a lot of funny to be found in those threads. it's not all bashing, not that many comments are ad hominem, and Crystal herself came to post a self-congratulory graphic! which yes, means her need for attention is still being fed, but it's *not* the only 'result' of the wank, faaaaaar from it.
i'm still laughing, for one. and i've learned new photoshop skills. does that comment make me a bitch? well then.
i'm not being manipulated by Crsytal. maybe she gets her rocks off from the attention (looks like it!) but this ain't a war. i'm not out to win anything, only have fun. as long as i'm having fun, sorry, I win *also*. it's ridiculous to see it any other way, imo.
/rant. sorry, dutch_eowyn, for the spammage. i totally agree to disagree on this but i had to pipe up, this once. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-20 03:46 am (UTC)when i say 'it's ridiculous to see it any other way' i'm not commenting on the angle of, like, what your original post is about, the fact that it's sad too and maybe Crystal is suffering-- that's a valid angle and everything, no problem.
i meant in regards to the 'omg the wankers 'lose', they're totally playing Crystal's game she's the winner there'.
because looking at any wank as a war is a mistake, imo. we mock to please ourselves, and our pleasure is all that we're out to get-- not a victory *over* anyone else, even the one we wank. i was just stating that. if we have fun, then we 'win'-- as in, we've only gained from a wank, not lost anything.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-20 04:19 am (UTC)Perfectly ok, both on the spammage as on the disagreeing. But I don't feel like discussing this. I said what I wanted to say about it in the entry, and I'm done with it now. But everybody who wants to comment (whether to give a thumbs-up or to raise an eyebrow) is welcome to comment or reply to other comments :D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 02:22 pm (UTC)Well expressed. It should be what makes us decent people and you are a good person for saying so.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 03:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 05:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 06:02 pm (UTC)And in the end, f_w makes no excuses for this fact: it exists to mock people. And yes, that can be cruel, or it can just be plain funny, but f_w makes no excuses and doesn't pretend to be anything other than what it is. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I'm not trying to excuse f_w or it's members for being mean, I just think you're misrepresenting it a bit by saying that people at f_w aren't letting the crystal thing go becuase at this point, no one's talking about her because the injokes are and have always been far funnier than the wankers.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 09:42 pm (UTC)See, I've been involved in internet fandoms since 1992. I've seen it happen before. Even though it usually denigrates into a free-for-all (and yes, I've put in my 25 cents of snark over there!), it is wise to unmask folks like this.
I say this because I've seen people wounded horribly, emotionally, by these kinds of psychos in RL, as it spilled off the net. I've seen people be swindled out of thousands of dollars, in the name of friendship which was held with a psycho.
We are, just by participating in fandoms, a wee bit obsessive. *raises hand* Yup, me too. But there are lines you don't cross, implicit behaviors you don't disregard. There is very little in this virtual world on which we can base and maintain our relationships, and that very little is a trust. You don't screw me over, I won't screw you over.
She tromped all over that, and is STILL doing it.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-19 09:46 pm (UTC)It's like, all these internal feuds that we can't resolve, because no-one is right or wrong.
So when we DO find someone who is wrong, we beat it to death. It was the same way with the notorious VB/Mr. Frodo. Yeah, she's a wacko and was out to defraud people, but MONTHS of self-pity and self-congratulations and post mortems?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-20 10:49 am (UTC)Re: last paragraph
Date: 2004-04-20 12:51 pm (UTC)But once you've got one hand nailed up, how do you plan to drive in the OTHER nail?
Date: 2004-04-20 03:33 pm (UTC)Re: But once you've got one hand nailed up, how do you plan to drive in the OTHER nail?
Date: 2004-04-26 03:18 am (UTC)Amen to that. It's highly amusing to those folks that don't even contribute to the mess. I just read it. I'm all for taking her down. Way down. Down to the depths of snail mail. She's lying. She's selling shit that isn't even hers. That. Is. A. Crime.